CTABKA Posted June 8, 2023 Report Posted June 8, 2023 En till Perry sez = Q&A som bryter mot reglerna, se till att spela enligt reglerna och sunt förnuft. Se länk. http://www.gamesquad.com/forums/index.php?threads/ift-attack-on-concealed-bu-afv.184214/page-3#post-2133621
carlsson Posted June 19, 2023 Report Posted June 19, 2023 Har inte läst alla frågor och svar, men om jag fattar det rätt handlar det om det går att skjuta IFT och MG mot en Concealed AFV/Dummy. Så som jag har spelat detta: Skjuta IFT med halv FP mot en concealed 5/8 bricka = Chans att förlora concealment. Effekt kan med lite tur även uppnås på CE Personnel. Skjuta TH med en MG på samma mål = +2 på TH. Hur har du spelat detta Mel?
Sparafucil3 Posted June 21, 2023 Report Posted June 21, 2023 For what it is worth Melvin, this is a perfect example of a Q&A I happen to disagree with. I do believe an MG firing a TH/TK vs a concealed target is covered with the +2 Case K TH DRM and SHOULD be allowed to affect a concealed AFV. But I don't play it according to my beliefs because the Q&A exists. I am not trying to change your mind, this just provided me a chance to point out I don't always agree with the Q&A.
carlsson Posted June 21, 2023 Report Posted June 21, 2023 I think the Q&A is definitely wrong in this instance.
Sparafucil3 Posted June 21, 2023 Report Posted June 21, 2023 2 hours ago, carlsson said: I think the Q&A is definitely wrong in this instance. I agree, and between friends, I would consider playing without it. But if we showed up to play a tournament, I would expect we would use the Q&A unless it was outlined in the tournament rules. JMO though. 1
Bergwall Posted June 22, 2023 Report Posted June 22, 2023 On 6/19/2023 at 9:04 AM, carlsson said: Har inte läst alla frågor och svar, men om jag fattar det rätt handlar det om det går att skjuta IFT och MG mot en Concealed AFV/Dummy. Så som jag har spelat detta: Skjuta IFT med halv FP mot en concealed 5/8 bricka = Chans att förlora concealment. Effekt kan med lite tur även uppnås på CE Personnel. Skjuta TH med en MG på samma mål = +2 på TH. Hur har du spelat detta Mel? I have played it the same way. And with respect to concealment loss like this: Regarding the first case - If concealed AFV - concealment loss only if effect is achieved on CE personnel. No concealment loss if the target is concealed AFV with no CE personnel. - If 5/8 dummies - dummies removed if effect is secured on the IFT (dummies vulnerable as infantry so to speak). Regarding the second case: - If concealed tank - concealment loss if hit is secured. - If 5/8 dummies - dummies not removed due to hit is secured (but could maybe be removed due specific collateral attack? not sure however....)
Sparafucil3 Posted June 22, 2023 Report Posted June 22, 2023 (edited) 5 hours ago, Bergwall said: - If 5/8 dummies - dummies not removed due to hit is secured (but could maybe be removed due specific collateral attack? not sure however....) By rule, 5/8" Dummies are removed as if Infantry. I don't think VTT is even a valid Target Type for them. Would be an interesting question for @Klas Malmström. I am not sure how I would handle it if an MG could fire TH/TK against a Dummy stack pretending to be an AFV. That is one of the positive aspects of the Q&A. It side-steps this issue. Doesn't mean I like it though Edited June 22, 2023 by Sparafucil3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now