Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Sparafucil3 last won the day on September 23

Sparafucil3 had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Sparafucil3's Achievements


Explorer (4/14)

  • One Year In
  • One Month Later
  • Week One Done
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges



  1. Sparafucil3

    ASLOK 23

    I wish we Americans were less unfriendly at the border. I also wish the Swedish contingent were coming over in 2023. I need to know when you do come. I will do my best to get there so we can catch up. -- jim
  2. I try to keep my articles up to date as errata and Q&A are posted. Sadly, I am not infallible in this task either. I am glad this issue was resolved.
  3. By rule, 5/8" Dummies are removed as if Infantry. I don't think VTT is even a valid Target Type for them. Would be an interesting question for @Klas Malmström. I am not sure how I would handle it if an MG could fire TH/TK against a Dummy stack pretending to be an AFV. That is one of the positive aspects of the Q&A. It side-steps this issue. Doesn't mean I like it though
  4. I agree, and between friends, I would consider playing without it. But if we showed up to play a tournament, I would expect we would use the Q&A unless it was outlined in the tournament rules. JMO though.
  5. For what it is worth Melvin, this is a perfect example of a Q&A I happen to disagree with. I do believe an MG firing a TH/TK vs a concealed target is covered with the +2 Case K TH DRM and SHOULD be allowed to affect a concealed AFV. But I don't play it according to my beliefs because the Q&A exists. I am not trying to change your mind, this just provided me a chance to point out I don't always agree with the Q&A.
  6. This is the natural order of things. People play it how they think it should be played and then they get exposed to the "right way" and begin again. As I said, I played it this way because I am aware of the Q&A. I was made aware playing a game with Steve Pleva at ASLOk. He showed it to me. I have played it this way ever since. I don't believe Q&A or Errata are infallible. Far from it. But I do agree to be bound by them because it is the only way we have a reasonable chance to be playing the same game. I travel far and wide to play ASL with folks. Seems only fair to be trying to play the same game.
  7. I played it this way (2/4) in the past because I was aware of the Perry Sez.
  8. I think the Q&A is wrong. But we live with it
  9. A .50 is not a unit but I bet you would properly point out a unit manning an HMG can interdict out to 16 hexes.
  10. I submitted a Perry Sez on this. There is no Interdiction. You can find it in Klas' collection.
  11. I hope you all have fun. It was hard to choose between Supporting Fire and Bounding Fire, but I have never been to Bounding Fire and that means new people to meet. Perhaps next year. -- jim
  12. My blog doesn't pretend to be able to teach good players how to play the game. I might occasionally surprise you with something but I don't expect that to happen very often, if ever. I am trying to help new players and middle-level players. Thanks for reading though. You are welcome to create and an article and I will post it for you.
  13. I don't think I would add too much traffic (not that many people are reading my blog) but I don't want to create problems for you. -- jim
  • Create New...