CTABKA Posted June 8 Report Share Posted June 8 En till Perry sez = Q&A som bryter mot reglerna, se till att spela enligt reglerna och sunt förnuft. Se länk. http://www.gamesquad.com/forums/index.php?threads/ift-attack-on-concealed-bu-afv.184214/page-3#post-2133621 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlsson Posted June 19 Report Share Posted June 19 Har inte läst alla frågor och svar, men om jag fattar det rätt handlar det om det går att skjuta IFT och MG mot en Concealed AFV/Dummy. Så som jag har spelat detta: Skjuta IFT med halv FP mot en concealed 5/8 bricka = Chans att förlora concealment. Effekt kan med lite tur även uppnås på CE Personnel. Skjuta TH med en MG på samma mål = +2 på TH. Hur har du spelat detta Mel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparafucil3 Posted June 21 Report Share Posted June 21 For what it is worth Melvin, this is a perfect example of a Q&A I happen to disagree with. I do believe an MG firing a TH/TK vs a concealed target is covered with the +2 Case K TH DRM and SHOULD be allowed to affect a concealed AFV. But I don't play it according to my beliefs because the Q&A exists. I am not trying to change your mind, this just provided me a chance to point out I don't always agree with the Q&A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlsson Posted June 21 Report Share Posted June 21 I think the Q&A is definitely wrong in this instance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparafucil3 Posted June 21 Report Share Posted June 21 2 hours ago, carlsson said: I think the Q&A is definitely wrong in this instance. I agree, and between friends, I would consider playing without it. But if we showed up to play a tournament, I would expect we would use the Q&A unless it was outlined in the tournament rules. JMO though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bergwall Posted June 22 Report Share Posted June 22 On 6/19/2023 at 9:04 AM, carlsson said: Har inte läst alla frågor och svar, men om jag fattar det rätt handlar det om det går att skjuta IFT och MG mot en Concealed AFV/Dummy. Så som jag har spelat detta: Skjuta IFT med halv FP mot en concealed 5/8 bricka = Chans att förlora concealment. Effekt kan med lite tur även uppnås på CE Personnel. Skjuta TH med en MG på samma mål = +2 på TH. Hur har du spelat detta Mel? I have played it the same way. And with respect to concealment loss like this: Regarding the first case - If concealed AFV - concealment loss only if effect is achieved on CE personnel. No concealment loss if the target is concealed AFV with no CE personnel. - If 5/8 dummies - dummies removed if effect is secured on the IFT (dummies vulnerable as infantry so to speak). Regarding the second case: - If concealed tank - concealment loss if hit is secured. - If 5/8 dummies - dummies not removed due to hit is secured (but could maybe be removed due specific collateral attack? not sure however....) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparafucil3 Posted June 22 Report Share Posted June 22 (edited) 5 hours ago, Bergwall said: - If 5/8 dummies - dummies not removed due to hit is secured (but could maybe be removed due specific collateral attack? not sure however....) By rule, 5/8" Dummies are removed as if Infantry. I don't think VTT is even a valid Target Type for them. Would be an interesting question for @Klas Malmström. I am not sure how I would handle it if an MG could fire TH/TK against a Dummy stack pretending to be an AFV. That is one of the positive aspects of the Q&A. It side-steps this issue. Doesn't mean I like it though Edited June 22 by Sparafucil3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bergwall Posted June 22 Report Share Posted June 22 What does the QA say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.