Fann en intressant regel (som vi har spelat fel på) när jag skrev vidare på mina uppdaterade 3rd edition regler.

A FT unit that enters a minefield (or disembark/dismount) is not subject to the -1 FP modifier for a minefield attack.

Rules contradicts each other, but B28.3 is the rule that comes into effect due to being higher numbered.

A22.4 Vulnerability: Any personnel unit possessing a FT must deduct one (per FT possessed) from the IFT resolution DR of any attack (including ordnance hits) against it. The PRC of a vehicle equipped with a FT are not penalized by the presence of that vehicular FT, or by transporting an otherwise unpossessed FT SW.

B28.3 The TEM of a minefield hex is equal to that of the other terrain in the hex. However, there is no TEM (including FFMO/ FFNAM) or FP modifier to a minefield attack [EXC: A-P minefield attacks are resolved with half FP in Deep Snow and a +1 DRM applies].

Edited September 15, 2025Sep 15 by CTABKA

Hur reglerna kommer uppdateras, till en kortare och därmed tydligare text, mycket "död-text" i D. Greenwood's regel skrift.

A22.4 Vulnerability: Any personnel unit possessing a FT must deduct one (per FT possessed) from the IFT resolution DR of any attack against it [EXC: no minus DRM applies from any minefield attacks; B28.3].

B28.3 No DRM: There is no TEM (including FFMO/ FFNAM) or FP  modifier to a minefield attack [EXC: A-P minefield attacks are resolved with half FP in Deep Snow and a +1 DRM applies].

Edited September 15, 2025Sep 15 by CTABKA